You Can be Great If You Really Want To

Six Sigma is usually associated with the complete overhaul of existing business processes, to reduce shortcomings and improve the quality of goods and services. Due to this belief, many companies with insufficient resources often avoid implementing the 6 Sigma concepts and methodologies in their business processes. These companies are often unaware that the Six Sigma concepts and methodologies can also be implemented with innovative shortcuts. These shortcuts are known to have the same affect on the quality as the standard 6 Sigma implementation processes.

Avoid Time Consuming And Costly Implementation Processes

The standard Six Sigma implementation techniques involve expenses on the technique applied for assimilation of customer input. This is done with the intention of designing new products and processes, for the benefit of the clients. The basic problem is that it is a tedious task to quantify customer input, which is often as vague as ‘more stylish’, ‘less expensive’ or ‘better than X brand’.

A company that does not have the adequate resources to quantifying such vague requirements can simply skip this step and move on. There is not much to lose, since it is an established fact that most customers look for quality, affordability and style. It is often a waste of valuable resources when companies spend large amounts of money on understanding these common requirements of customers, over a period of time.

Avoid Standards And Generalizations

In large organizations, the top executives spend a lot of time on the implementation of the Six Sigma projects. However, in small and medium sized companies, the top executives are often too busy to look into the Six Sigma programs. 6 Sigma projects can be successfully implemented even without the support of the top executives. It is a general misconception that Six Sigma programs can only be executed when everyone, from executive to clerk, is involved in the project.

Opt For The Most Cost Effective Six Sigma Training

Although it is necessary to provide training to employees involved in the 6 Sigma implementation project, companies often go overboard by following the set standards of 160 to 240 hours of Black Belt training. Conscientious employees do not require such extensive training, as they are already aware of the quality expectations of them. Companies can save time and reduce training costs by opting for training programs that concentrate more on the techniques that are new and haven’t been addressed before.

The most cost-effective way is to opt for the online training programs. They are not only less expensive but also enable employees to access the information and learn in their free time. In this way, companies can ensure that the productive time of employees is not wasted on Six Sigma training.

Use Innovation And Creativity Wherever Possible

Although Six Sigma methodologies make use of the latest statistical tools and techniques, most of the basic quality improvement concepts and philosophies are based on motivation. Instead of using the set standards, companies can devise their own innovative methods and techniques that could help in achieving the same results. In this way, companies can easily tap into the benefits associated with Six Sigma programs in a shorter time span.

Six Sigma professionals have the requisite expertise and experience in implementing Six Sigma projects and their services are necessary for ensuring the success of the implementations. However, not all organizations can afford such services because 6 Sigma professionals normally charge hefty fees. The best option then for such organizations is to provide Six Sigma training to their existing employees. Training existing employees not only helps in reducing implementation costs but also ensures that the implementations are completed within the specified time.

However, selecting the most appropriate training course for employees may not always be easy because of the recent increase in the number of entities offering 6 Sigma training courses. The problem is compounded because most of the training entities claim to be the best in the business.

Organizations can develop their own training institutes, but this can further complicate the financial health of an organization that is already running short of funds. The best option then is to select the most cost-effective training program for the employees. Given below are some of the basics that a good 6 Sigma training program should always have:

1. The training program should cover important Six Sigma methodologies such as DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve, and control) and DMADV (define, measure, analyze, design and verify).

2. The training program should aim at creating awareness about the roles and responsibilities of personnel associated with 6 Sigma implementations. It should make the employees learn the tenets of effective communications, which is a necessity for successful Six Sigma implementations.

3. The training should cover all types of Six Sigma statistical tools such as Critical Path Method (CPM). CPM helps in designing a proper timetable that predetermines the start and completion of key events in any business process. With the help of CPM, employees can easily find out the exact status of various projects by monitoring key events through the CPM timetable. Other important statistical tools that need to be covered include FMEA (Failure mode and Effects Analysis), which helps in anticipating future problems through analytical interpretations.

4. The training should enable employees to learn the use of software tools such as RapAnalyst, which simplifies DOE (Design of Experiments) and many other activities related to data mining; MiniTab and SixNet Intelligence; and the 6 Sigma calculator, which is a hand tool. The training should also cover the use of judgmental tools such as Ishikawa Root Cause Analysis Diagram (Fishbone diagram), Brain Storming & Affinity Group Tool, Thought Map, and Regulation Diagram.

5. The training should also enable employees to learn soft skills such as presentation skills and managerial skills such as decision-making. These skills will go a long way in ensuring the success of 6 Sigma implementations.

A 6 Sigma training program that covers all the aspects stated above needs to be selected, even if it is relatively more expensive than other available training programs.

Related Blogs

• Small Business News: Healthcare Prognosis? | Small Business Trends
• BioHealth Business Daily (APPA, GENZ, GENT, MRK, OSIP, OXGN, SOMX, THRX, CLDX) – 24/7 Wall St.
• The Importance of Using Social Networking for Business; Part I – Facebook | IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law

In any organization, the first deployment of a Six Sigma project is bound to encounter some level of resistance. Sometimes, opposition to the methodology is based on territory; department heads may be unwilling to cede control of their resources. Other times, the resistance may be due to a simple lack of belief in the approach. That is, employees, managers, and department heads may be unconvinced that the initiative will yield measurable benefits. In many cases, the staff may have been exposed to a series of faddish process improvement assignments only to watch them be dismantled and discarded. As such, it’s hard to begrudge them their skepticism.

The challenge for Six Sigma teams is to identify the disbelievers and encourage their adoption of the methodology. Below, we’ll explore the factors that separate the believers and disbelievers. I’ll explain when senior management needs to get involved and their role in changing their organization’s culture. I’ll also describe how Kaizen can be used as an effective transformational tool.

What Separates The Believers And Disbelievers

Before building a road to conversion, it’s important to first define why the cynics are skeptical of the Six Sigma methodology. As noted, one of the reasons is due to watching the adoption and subsequent abandonment of other process improvement disciplines. But, that obstacle is relatively simple to overcome. Far more problematic is that many skeptics have a cynical perception of the approach due to receiving training that was either insufficient or poorly presented.

Similarly, supporters usually comprise two distinct groups. The first group is made up of those who are naturally drawn to the precise analysis of metrics and the application of solutions based on statistics. These converts often hail from fields that are non-technical in nature. The second group of supporters come from backgrounds that rely heavily upon numbers, statistics, and analysis. While typically less enthusiastic than the first group, once they have bought into the Six Sigma approach, they become dependable and devoted resources.

When Executive Leadership Gets Involved

While the project team – including Black Belts and Champions – can be instrumental in converting skeptics, the conversion is usually slow. When time permits, it’s performed individually due to a lack of resources. Eventually, senior management must get involved. The CEO and top-level executives can exert influence that Black Belts and Champions cannot.

Every initiative must have the full support of an organization’s executive leadership for a successful implementation. If skepticism exists, that support is vital in order to remove roadblocks and convert cynics.

Changing The Culture Through Kaizen

Many managers who deal with a large population of skeptics look to Kaizen for popularizing the Six Sigma methodology. To be sure, it can help. Encouraging employees to pursue process-related efficiencies and making them accountable for smaller continuous improvements can slowly change the culture within an organization. The problem is making the transition from a Kaizen-based initiative to the rigorous quantitative analysis employed by a Six Sigma project. If that transition does not happen quickly enough, employees may come to focus too heavily upon Kaizen. When that happens, it becomes another obstacle to the project.

Every organization copes with some level of skepticism when introducing a new methodology for analyzing and improving business processes. If previous attempts have been made and abandoned, the level of skepticism is likely greater. Whether Six Sigma is being implemented as a first attempt at process improvement or a “last try” after a series of failures, the disbelievers can be converted. Once they are, a successful deployment is far more likely.

Related Blogs